Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine vs Semen Pankin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Oct at 09:29 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Bittoun Kouzmine vs S. Pankin

FRA
2
Win
Played
1
Win

RUS
2
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Kouzmine 2 - 1 Pankin
They have played 6 sets in total, with Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine winning 4 and Semen Pankin winning 2. The last match between Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine and Semen Pankin was at the M15 Kayseri, 04-10-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kouzmine | 2 |
| Pankin | 1 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(SF) M15 Kayseri(10-04-25)
(SF) M15 Kayseri(09-20-25)
(SF) M15 Kayseri(06-21-25)
C. B. Kouzmine vs S. Pankin H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.01% (301-227) | Career Total W/L | 64.17% (77-43) |
| 2 | Hard | 1 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. B. Kouzmine vs S. Pankin Match Preview:
- How has each player's second serve performed recently? Semen Pankin has secured 44.42% of points, slightly outperforming Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine, who has achieved 41.63%.
- In terms of return games, Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine leads, capturing 45.87% of his opponent's second serve points, compared to Semen Pankin's 42.79%.
- When returning first serves, Kouzmine has a slight edge with 29.27% versus Pankin's 27.58%.
- Looking at breakpoints under pressure, Pankin excels, having saved 55.62%, while Kouzmine has saved 50.60%.
- What is their overall match performance over the past year? Pankin has a stronger record, winning 65.71% of matches (46/24), whereas Kouzmine has won 51.52% (34/32).
- On which surface does each player perform best? Pankin shines on clay with a 66% win rate, while Kouzmine is more comfortable on hard courts, also at 66%.
- The level of competition may influence predictions. Pankin has faced opponents with an average rank of 332.34, whereas Kouzmine's opponents averaged a rank of 454.61.
- In head-to-head matchups, they are evenly matched, each having one win and two sets won.
- So, who performs better in deciding sets? Constantin has the upper hand here, winning 35% to Pankin's 32% in the past year.
Editorial Prediction (October 4, 2025, UTC):
Both players demonstrate unique strengths and vulnerabilities. Semen Pankin shows a stronger second serve performance and a better ability to save breakpoints.
In comparison, Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine excels in return games and has a slight edge when playing deciding sets. However, he faces tougher opponents based on average rankings, which might provide a competitive boost in experience.
Considering their head-to-head record and current statistics, Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine might have a minor advantage due to his return game efficiency and performance under pressure in closely contested matches. Therefore, based on these analytics, Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine is slightly more likely to emerge victorious in their upcoming match.
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine vs Semen Pankin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. B. Kouzmine vs S. Pankin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 33 | Games Won | 30 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 17 |
| 2:5:59 | Average Match Time | 2:5:59 |
| 66% (132/199) | 1st Serve % | 54% (136/253) |
| 59% (78/132) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (83/136) |
| 46% (31/67) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (50/117) |
| 33% (14/42) | Break Pts Won % | 48% (12/25) |
| 47% (120/253) | Return Points Win % | 45% (90/199) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. B. Kouzmine Recent Matches Played
S. Pankin Recent Matches Played

C. B. Kouzmine vs S. Pankin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.01% (301/227) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.17% (77/43) |
| 56.54% (670/515) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.92% (168/99) |
| 53.78% (5865/5040) | Games Win/Loss | 55.70% (1426/1134) |
| 61.27% (193/122) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.81% (35/19) |
| 53.38% (71/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.10% (39/20) |
| 46.25% (37/43) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 657 | Aces Total | 260 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 927 | Total Double Faults | 217 |
| 1:27:50 | Average Match Time | 1:4:15 |
| 428.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 323.04 |
| 68% (18820/27819) | 1st Serve % | 59% (2965/5021) |
| 64% (12066/18820) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2016/2965) |
| 51% (4596/8999) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1070/2056) |
| 45% (1333/2959) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (247/584) |
| 42% (11593/27685) | Return Points Win % | 43% (2146/5047) |
| 34.78% (16/30) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 59.13% (285/197) | Futures W/L | 64.96% (76/41) |
| 57% (297/519) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (73/116) |
| 20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 48% (59/122) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 35% (11/31) |
| 48% (61/128) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (11/29) |
| 87% (310/269) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (80/71) |
| 13% (310/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (80/9) |
| 15% (218/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (40/5) |